Merge & Acquisition
Kroger Accuses Albertsons of Collusion with C&S in New Court Filing

Legal Battle Intensifies Over Kroger Albertsons Collusion
Kroger has accused Albertsons of collusion, claiming secret tactics disrupted the now-failed $24.6 billion grocery merger. This Kroger Albertsons collusion controversy has gained momentum after newly revealed communications came to light.
Secret Communications Undermine Merger Efforts
Kroger stated that while working to secure federal approval, Albertsons secretly coordinated with C&S Wholesale Grocers. This effort aimed to pressure Kroger into increasing the number of divested stores. According to Kroger, Albertsons‘ CEO Susan Morris used personal devices to communicate with C&S executives, ultimately weakening regulatory confidence in the deal.
Termination Fee Sparks Legal Dispute
After courts blocked the merger, Albertsons swiftly filed a lawsuit seeking a $600 million termination fee. Kroger counters that Albertsons had long planned litigation, abandoning its duty to close the merger. Kroger emphasized that this misconduct invalidates any financial claim by Albertsons.
Courts Cite Evidence of Collusion
The Washington court specifically cited Albertsons’ hidden correspondence as a factor in its decision. These actions allegedly demonstrated a breach of good faith, fueling Kroger’s legal argument. Moreover, Kroger insists it acted in good faith throughout the regulatory process, ready to explore all legal avenues for approval.
Future Uncertain as Lawsuit Proceeds
The legal clash continues, with Albertsons asserting Kroger’s conduct killed the deal. Meanwhile, Kroger remains firm, pointing to the alleged Kroger Albertsons collusion as the real issue behind the failed agreement.
Stay Updated
Explore more breaking news and business insights by visiting our website for the latest updates on high-profile corporate disputes.